![]() “This does convey that if a company is aggressively marketing its pureness, then this lawsuit is saying the company needs to be held to a higher standard,” Neltner said. Regardless, the synthetic chemicals are allegedly in a product that claims to be free from them. ![]() If the chemicals were intentionally added to the product, then the levels would probably be much higher, Neltner said. It is unclear how or why PFAS are in Simply Tropical as the chemicals could be contaminating the water that is mixed with the juice, the fruit or packaging. Testing from academic and EPA researchers over the last two years has found high levels of the chemicals can leach into food and other products that have been treated with PFAS. ![]() A lawsuit filed in late December just days ahead of the class action suit asks a judge to order Houston-based firm Inhance to stop adding PFAS to plastic. The suit comes amid increased scrutiny over the use of PFAS in plastic. No limits for PFAS in fruit juice or other food products exist in the US. The complaint doesn’t provide specific test results, but said testing found PFOA and PFOS levels “hundreds of times” above what the EPA considers safe for drinking water. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last year found that virtually no exposure to the two compounds in drinking water is safe. The suit said third-party testing found PFOA and PFOS, two of the most dangerous compounds, which were used for decades before being largely phased out in the US, but which continue to contaminate the nation’s environment. Simply’s marketing, the complaint continues, “is intentionally designed to drive sales and increase profits by targeting health-conscious consumers”. The labeling is part of Simply’s wider marketing campaign, which positions the juice as being “transparent, natural, simple in order to gain the trust of reasonable consumers who reasonably believe that the product is free from synthetic” ingredients, the suit says. “In reality, testing has revealed that the product contains, a category of synthetic chemicals that are, by definition, not natural,” the complaint states. The inclusion of “filtered water” leads “reasonable consumers to believe that additional care has been taken to remove any incidental chemicals or impurities,” the complaint states. The complaint takes aim at several specific claims on Simply’s packaging and branding, including mentions of “all natural ingredients”, “simply natural”, and “nothing to hide”. We stand by the quality of our products.” The suit, filed in the southern district of New York, asks a judge to order monetary compensation and take other “appropriate” steps.Ī Coca-Cola spokesperson said: “We are aware of the lawsuit, which focuses on our Simply Tropical product. “As we get better and better able to measure PFAS at lower levels and the FDA falls further behind on what it is testing … then you’re going to keep seeing these lawsuits pop up,” said Tom Neltner, chemicals policy director with the Environmental Defense Fund, a non-profit that pressures the FDA to take stronger action on PFAS. It annually tests some food products for the chemicals, but developed a methodology that ignores what public health advocates say are dangerous levels. ![]() Still, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has taken little action to address food contamination. This Case alleges that during the Case Timeframe, American breached itsĬontract with Settlement Class Members by charging them to check one or more of their bags despite promises that they could do so for no charge.Water is considered to be a main exposure route, but researchers have recently found contaminated food to be more of a risk than previously thought. Of their bags for no charge, depending on route of travel, cabin of service, frequent flyer status or other reasons. When customers buy tickets from American for air travel, a contract is formed in which American promises certain customers that they can check a certain number This Case alleges that American incorrectly charged certain customers baggage fees after Februfor tickets purchased before Ap(“Case Timeframe”), breaching American’sĬontract with these customers. American denies the allegations in the lawsuit, and the Court has not decided who is right. The purpose of this website is to inform you that a Settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit alleging that American Airlines, Inc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |